Skip to main content
Law

Return to Question

Remove unecessary anecdotes and link to question, focus on the legal question.
Source Link
Ryan M
Ryan M
  • 10.3k
  • 2
  • 47
  • 63

Who owns the rights to the questionquestions on stack exchangeStack Exchange?

I asked a question here a year ago and this was removed. Who owns the rights to the question, and can it be republished? You can see the question here https://derspreebogen.home.blog/2019/07/25/the-evil-spying-germans/ with some edits.

I believe that one of the stack exchange group customers (ie. buys ads) was the subject of the post. On what grounds could it have been removed? Surely not in the public interest - that is to say if the public interest condones conduct that is vorboten under the German criminal code?

Who owns the rights to the question on stack exchange?

I asked a question here a year ago and this was removed. Who owns the rights to the question and can it be republished? You can see the question here https://derspreebogen.home.blog/2019/07/25/the-evil-spying-germans/ with some edits.

I believe that one of the stack exchange group customers (ie. buys ads) was the subject of the post. On what grounds could it have been removed? Surely not in the public interest - that is to say if the public interest condones conduct that is vorboten under the German criminal code?

Who owns the rights to the questions on Stack Exchange?

I asked a question here a year ago and this was removed. Who owns the rights to the question, and can it be republished?

On what grounds could it have been removed?

Became Hot Network Question
Source Link
Roger Ng
Roger Ng
  • 137
  • 1
  • 3

Who owns the rights to the question on stack exchange?

I asked a question here a year ago and this was removed. Who owns the rights to the question and can it be republished? You can see the question here https://derspreebogen.home.blog/2019/07/25/the-evil-spying-germans/ with some edits.

I believe that one of the stack exchange group customers (ie. buys ads) was the subject of the post. On what grounds could it have been removed? Surely not in the public interest - that is to say if the public interest condones conduct that is vorboten under the German criminal code?