1

Is a homeowner required to control the stormwater from their property to keep it from flooding their neighbor's back yard if the surrounding topography naturally directs it there? For example, if a gutter's downspout drains directly towards a neighbor's lot.

Could the neighbor sue the homeowner if the latter fails to control the stormwater? What if the stormwater's flow pattern has pre-dated the homeowner's ownership of their house?

2
  • I've gone ahead and edited your question substantially to resolve the close reason. Please confirm I did not change your intent. Commented May 30 at 14:16
  • yes thank you. This is what I wanted to ask.
    – Rainmaker
    Commented May 30 at 14:26

2 Answers 2

1

Your Responsibility

As a general rule, if you develop a property, you need to control the stormwater that your property generates in a manner that conforms with the requirements of NJAC 7:8.

The initial promulgation of these rules occurred in 2004* and required all Major Development** of a site after that date to control runoff from disturbed areas to conform with, among other things, runoff rate. Meaning, if your lot already discharged a peak rate of 3 cubic feet per second (CFS) from a storm with a 1% recurrence interval (i.e. a 100-year storm), you would be allowed to continue to discharge towards that lot provided you conformed with NJAC 7:8. Without getting into the technical nature of NJAC 7:8 says, you could at most have a peak discharge that matched existing.

Notably, the rule does not require you to conform with the rules if you're not doing anything that triggers the Major Development threshold. This means that there is a degree of implicit permission to increase stormwater towards a neighbor, but the triggers for Major Development are generally low so it's unlikely you'll be able to increase it very much.

It is possible for local municipalities to have additional requirements which may apply to home improvement projects and sometimes those rules include storm controls. Those might have applied to the installation of the gutters, but you'd have to check your local codes. Regardless, it's unlikely that your project substantially altered the drainage patterns (i.e. if 1,000 SF of impervious roof was going towards your neighbor before the gutters and now due to the gutters it's 1,100 SF of impervious roof, it's not likely to be making a ton of difference).

Other Factors

Finally, let's focus on your neighbor's responsibilities. When he purchased his house, he certainly had the right to inspect the landscape and observe whether or not there was the potential for poor drainage conditions. If he felt unqualified, the purchase of all homes in NJ requires a survey of the lot to determine the property corners, but he could've also paid the surveyor to pick up and show topography (I did).

As an additional point of discussion, it's also possible that climate change is worsening storms in your area. Updates to NJAC 7:8 have had an eye towards increasing the intensity of the design storms in order to address issues with previous storm controls being underdesigned. A primary driving factor for this stems from the fact that NJ has been hit with multiple 500-year flood events since 1999 which from the regulators' point of view suggests that '500-year flood' is a misnomer (more than it already is).

The practical effect of these more intense storm events is that flooding may occur in areas where it didn't before. If your neighbor's lot has a low lying area with generally well draining soils, they may've not had an issue before. However, if due to climate change you regularly have multiple rain events in a row, the soil will become saturated and eventually be unable to receive any additional runoff and thus begin to pond. While this sucks for your neighbor, that's climate change. It usually sucks.

*This link is to the current iteration of the rules which went into effect in 2023. The differences between the 2004 and 2023 version are substantial from a technical point of view, but generally irrelevant for the purposes of answering this question.

**Major Development is a specific term defined in NJAC 7:8-1.2 and has expanded with later iterations of the rule. But the short version is that if you develop your lot in a manner that either disturbs more than an acre of land or constructs 1/4 acre or more of impervious surface, then the rule applies to you.

2

You are responsible for controlling stormwater running off your property

You have to control man-made alterations that change the natural flow of rainwater so they do not pose a nuisance to your neighbours.

You need to:

  • Capture the water and divert it to a utility stormwater drain on your property (if there is one). You may need a pump.
  • Build a French drain or absorption pit (different names for the same thing) sufficiently large that the water doesn’t cause a nuisance by the time it reaches your neighbour.

This often catches people by surprise as it may not have bothered the neighbour for years, but they start using the property in a different way or they sell it and what wasn’t a problem suddenly is.

2
  • Can you clarify if Australia's stormwater rules apply to existing drainage patterns? It seems unreasonable for someone living in an unchanged house to suddenly have to install a bunch of storm controls to redirect stormwater from a neighbor's lot when that water had been going that way for many years before already. Commented Jun 3 at 13:43
  • @Pyrotechnical existing: yes, natural:no. If there are no man made structures, you don’t have to do anything about natural watercourses. If there are man made structures that concentrate the water, even if they are 200 years old, you do.
    – Dale M
    Commented Jun 3 at 22:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .