Imagine this scenario:
- Bill A is passed, creating Law A.
- Bill B is passed. It modifies some parts of Law A, plus it adds some laws that depend on it and some laws that do not.
- A court rules that Bill A was not validly passed and must be repealed.
(Example of the last point: the Australian Petroleum and Minerals Authority Act, 1973. The High Court that the bill had not been "defeated" by the Senate merely adjourning without considering it, so the requirements for holding a joint session to pass it, as Parliament had done, had not been met.)
Obviously the legislature would have to meet to resolve the conflict, but before it does, what is the state of the law with the valid parts of Bill B?