"it has 0 embassies but millions of churches" makes it sound like churches are treated as missions wrt. the quoted article 22.

[I realize this part of the answer is more about the phrasing of the question and not the main point.] "Turkey is seen as the offending party, and this is a fairly decided result (at least outside of Turkey) without benefit of trial." But on the other hand for Holocaust, it seems to be very often "Nazis" or "Nazi Germany" that did it, rarely just "Germany" – especially any association with modern-day Germany is usually avoided. I don't know much about Turkish history – is there a concrete reason why these cases seem to be treated differently, and which side would the Israel case land on?

@PJB Plenty of terms that sellers would want to put in sales contracts are illegal in plenty of countries.

@Quentin Harper is commenting on the "such a right would not serve the public interest" part of AR's answer, which does not seem to come from the 6th amendment.

@Davor "the question already points to the fact that one of the largest websites in the world already did this" The question mentions that "Steve Huffman [... edited ...] comments that criticized him", not that he edited comments to make them say something illegal.

@Deduplicator Perhaps it took 2 years to negotiate with the neighbor and realize he is doing this on purpose and will not back away, or to be convinced that there might be a legal solution to this problem?