I did intend that, and as Mr. Siegel mentions, "GTA-esqe game" also implies a derivative work, violating 17 USC 101.

While I see where you're coming from with that answer, it would still be considered valid if both parties agree to the set damages, however, no single person (to my knowledge) has access to $1tn in assets at the personal level, so it would be likely they are considered judgment proof.

I'm looking for Massachusetts. I'll update the post to reflect that clarification.