Skip to main content
Law

Return to Question

Tags
Link
feetwet ♦
feetwet ♦
  • 22.1k
  • 13
  • 87
  • 185
spelled out abbreviations and corrected a typo in the original united version (now v. not)
Source Link
ohwilleke
ohwilleke
  • 240k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 826

Unlike DOJI understand that, unlike United States Department of Justice lawyers, SECSecurities and Exchange Commission lawyers are nownot allowed the benefit of surveillance evidence or wiretaps gathered by agencies on the same suspects during investigations. Why

Is this the case? If so, what is the legal reason that this a thingis the case and what benefitpolicy does thatthis serve?

Unlike DOJ lawyers, SEC lawyers are now allowed the benefit of surveillance evidence or wiretaps gathered by agencies on the same suspects during investigations. Why is this a thing and what benefit does that serve?

I understand that, unlike United States Department of Justice lawyers, Securities and Exchange Commission lawyers are not allowed the benefit of surveillance evidence or wiretaps gathered by agencies on the same suspects during investigations.

Is this the case? If so, what is the legal reason that this is the case and what policy does this serve?

Source Link
Meta747
Meta747
  • 103
  • 2

Why are SEC lawyers kept in the dark about surveillance and wiretaps?

Unlike DOJ lawyers, SEC lawyers are now allowed the benefit of surveillance evidence or wiretaps gathered by agencies on the same suspects during investigations. Why is this a thing and what benefit does that serve?