Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

The California Vehicle Code Section 27001 states

(a) The driver of a motor vehicle when reasonably necessary to insure safe operation shall give audible warning with his horn.

 

(b) The horn shall not otherwise be used, except as a theft alarm system which operates as specified in Article 13 (commencing with Section 28085) of this chapter.

However, 95% of the times when I am startled by a car horn, the car is empty, and the horn has nothing to do with safe operation or a theft alarm system. Rather, the car is honking to let the owner know that he or she has just successfully locked the doors using a remote control - the so-called "honk-on-lock" feature.

Is this legal? Is it legal to sell a car which is configured to have this behavior? If not, why is the law not enforced? Would enforcement require additional legislative action? Proof of property damage?

The California Vehicle Code Section 27001 states

(a) The driver of a motor vehicle when reasonably necessary to insure safe operation shall give audible warning with his horn.

 

(b) The horn shall not otherwise be used, except as a theft alarm system which operates as specified in Article 13 (commencing with Section 28085) of this chapter.

However, 95% of the times when I am startled by a car horn, the car is empty, and the horn has nothing to do with safe operation or a theft alarm system. Rather, the car is honking to let the owner know that he or she has just successfully locked the doors using a remote control - the so-called "honk-on-lock" feature.

Is this legal? Is it legal to sell a car which is configured to have this behavior? If not, why is the law not enforced? Would enforcement require additional legislative action? Proof of property damage?

The California Vehicle Code Section 27001 states

(a) The driver of a motor vehicle when reasonably necessary to insure safe operation shall give audible warning with his horn.

(b) The horn shall not otherwise be used, except as a theft alarm system which operates as specified in Article 13 (commencing with Section 28085) of this chapter.

However, 95% of the times when I am startled by a car horn, the car is empty, and the horn has nothing to do with safe operation or a theft alarm system. Rather, the car is honking to let the owner know that he or she has just successfully locked the doors using a remote control - the so-called "honk-on-lock" feature.

Is this legal? Is it legal to sell a car which is configured to have this behavior? If not, why is the law not enforced? Would enforcement require additional legislative action? Proof of property damage?

Source Link

What is the legal and administrative status of honk-on-lock in California?

The California Vehicle Code Section 27001 states

(a) The driver of a motor vehicle when reasonably necessary to insure safe operation shall give audible warning with his horn.

(b) The horn shall not otherwise be used, except as a theft alarm system which operates as specified in Article 13 (commencing with Section 28085) of this chapter.

However, 95% of the times when I am startled by a car horn, the car is empty, and the horn has nothing to do with safe operation or a theft alarm system. Rather, the car is honking to let the owner know that he or she has just successfully locked the doors using a remote control - the so-called "honk-on-lock" feature.

Is this legal? Is it legal to sell a car which is configured to have this behavior? If not, why is the law not enforced? Would enforcement require additional legislative action? Proof of property damage?