2

New York Judiciary Law § 478 makes it illegal to practice law in New York state. I imagine that there is some law defining what constitutes practicing "in" the state, and that questions probably involve whether they are advising people in the state and whether they are located in the state while advising.

My question is: does any law prohibit an attorney who is admitted in New York from practicing the law of other jurisdictions, while that attorney is in New York state.

Obviously one must meet certain criteria (admission, pro hac vice, etc) to appear in court in another State as an attorney. But is it correct to assume that an Admitted Lawyer can practice the law of any jurisdiction, so long as they do so from within their home state?

Additional wrinkles:

  1. I vaguely remember something about it being the primary place you practice, such that (some/most) states don't prohibit an admitted New York attorney from occasionally providing advice in their state.

  2. I am interested in international jurisdictions as well.

  3. I imagine my assumption must be right, because a New York attorney is certainly not constrained from interpreting a contract with a Texas choice of law clause, so long that attorney does so in the context of practicing in New York.

5
  • I'll untag. I interpreted the tag as demarking questions related to the practice of civil rather than criminal or administrative law. Which seemed partially on-point. Very surprised there is not a legal-ethics or professional responsibility tag.
    – COMisHARD
    Commented Dec 12, 2016 at 16:03
  • The tag you wanted is civil-law. I added it. Commented Dec 12, 2016 at 16:15
  • 2
    I wonder what "in" means here? This line of reasoning would seem to suggest that if a lawyer admitted in New York takes a vacation in Arkansas and, while there, sends an email of legal advice to a client back in New York, she may have been illegally practicing law in Arkansas. Is that really true? Commented Dec 12, 2016 at 16:18
  • @Nate Eldredge while you surely can't be correct, it is a good excuse for me to keep in mind for not doing any work while on vacation. A related but more plausible issue is whether she could be subject to Arkansas state income taxes on fees earned while taking an extended (say 2 month) vacation in the state for NY clients (and would it matter where the checks were sent?).
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jan 6, 2017 at 18:53
  • This is a great question. Suppose my primary office and practice is in New York. I'm visiting my sister in Pennsylvania when I get a call from a client asking for help with Colorado law and I decide to provide it. In which jurisdiction(s) is that practice happening in? What if I'm admitted to the bar in Colorado but not Pennsylvania? What if I'm admitted in Pennsylvania but not Colorado? Commented Oct 16, 2021 at 14:04

1 Answer 1

3

The issue you describe is usually characterized as the multijurisdictional practice of law and is not terribly straightforward, in part, because the "practice of law" is not a well defined or consistently defined term.

For example, in New York, preparation of a title opinion is considered to be the practice of law, while in Colorado, it is not and title opinions are routinely prepared by non-lawyers in title companies and by a type of independent paraprofessional (with no formal licensing) known as a "landman".

As a rule of thumb:

  1. All work involving law in a jurisdiction where you are not admitted is subject to the ethical requirement that you be actually competent to render the opinion regardless of your formal licensure, and

  2. Normally, work involving law in a jurisdiction where you are not admitted must be incident to your representation of a client in a state where you are admitted to practice.

A leading analysis of the issues related to multijurisdictional practice is a 2002 report of the American Bar Association on the subject, much of which has been incorporated into the rules of professional ethics for attorneys of many states.

The core rule of professional conduct that was proposed and adopted in identical or similar form by many states from that report is as follows:

Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice Of Law

(a) A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction, or assist another in doing so.

(b) A lawyer who is not admitted to practice in this jurisdiction shall not:

(1) except as authorized by these Rules or other law, establish an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction for the practice of law; or

(2) hold out to the public or otherwise represent that the lawyer is admitted to practice law in this jurisdiction.

(c) A lawyer admitted in another United States jurisdiction, and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction, may provide legal services on a temporary basis in this jurisdiction that:

(1) are undertaken in association with a lawyer who is admitted to practice in this jurisdiction and who actively participates in the matter;

(2) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential proceeding before a tribunal in this or another jurisdiction, if the lawyer, or a person the lawyer is assisting, is authorized by law or order to appear in such proceeding or reasonably expects to be so authorized;

(3) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential arbitration, mediation, or other alternative resolution proceeding in this or another jurisdiction, if the services arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission; or

(4) are not within paragraphs (c) (2) or (c)(3) and arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice.

(d) A lawyer admitted in another United States jurisdiction or in a foreign jurisdiction, and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction or the equivalent thereof, or a person otherwise lawfully practicing as an in-house counsel under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction, may provide legal services through an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction that:

(1) are provided to the lawyer's employer or its organizational affiliates, are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission; and when performed by a foreign lawyer and requires advice on the law of this or another U.S. jurisdiction or of the United States, such advice shall be based upon the advice of a lawyer who is duly licensed and authorized by the jurisdiction to provide such advice; or

(2) are services that the lawyer is authorized by federal or other law or rule to provide in this jurisdiction.

(e) For purposes of paragraph (d):

(1) the foreign lawyer must be a member in good standing of a recognized legal profession in a foreign jurisdiction, the members of which are admitted to practice as lawyers or counselors at law or the equivalent, and subject to effective regulation and discipline by a duly constituted professional body or a public authority; or,

(2) the person otherwise lawfully practicing as an in-house counsel under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction must be authorized to practice under this rule by, in the exercise of its discretion, [the highest court of this jurisdiction].

The meaning of the rule quoted above is discussed in official and unofficial commentary beginning at page 19 of the ABA Report.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .