Bob has a right to a fair trial under Article 6 Human Rights Act 1988.
Supporting this right is the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA) and its accompanying Code of Practice that, among other things, lay out the rules and procedures for "disclosure" to ensure that Bob is given details of, access to, or copies of relevant non-sensitive material1 to enable him to prepare his defence.
Section 3 CPIA say that:
(1)The prosecutor must—
- (a)disclose to the accused any prosecution material which has not previously been disclosed to the accused and which might reasonably be considered capable of undermining the case for the prosecution against the accused or of assisting the case for the accused...
[...]
s.3 is the "Prosecution Test for Disclosure", and athough not every PNC court-print in every prosecution will satisfy this test, it seems to do so in Bob's case.
Now that he has had disclosure, Section 17 CPIA places an obligation of confidentiality on Bob and prohibits him from sharing the PNC printout (and all other material disclosed to him) except in the circumstances described within:
(1)If the accused is given or allowed to inspect a document or other object under—
(a)section 3, 4, 7A , 14 or 15, or
(b)an order under section 8,
then, subject to subsections (2) to (4), he must not use or disclose it or any information recorded in it.
(2)The accused may use or disclose the object or information—
(a)in connection with the proceedings for whose purposes he was given the object or allowed to inspect it,
(b)with a view to the taking of further criminal proceedings (for instance, by way of appeal) with regard to the matter giving rise to the proceedings mentioned in paragraph (a), or
(c)in connection with the proceedings first mentioned in paragraph (b).
(3)The accused may use or disclose—
(a)the object to the extent that it has been displayed to the public in open court, or
(b)the information to the extent that it has been communicated to the public in open court;
but the preceding provisions of this subsection do not apply if the object is displayed or the information is communicated in proceedings to deal with a contempt of court under section 18.
(4)If—
(a)the accused applies to the court for an order granting permission to use or disclose the object or information, and
(b)the court makes such an order,
the accused may use or disclose the object or information for the purpose and to the extent specified by the court
1The CPIA Code of Practice offers these definitions:
-
- material is material of any kind, including information and objects, which is obtained or inspected in the course of a criminal investigation and which may be relevant to the investigation. This includes not only material coming into the possession of the investigator (such as documents seized in the course of searching premises) but also material generated by them (such as interview records);
-
- material may be relevant to an investigation if it appears to an investigator, or to the officer in charge of an investigation, or to the disclosure officer, that it has some bearing on any offence under investigation or any person being investigated, or on the surrounding circumstances of the case, unless it is incapable of having any impact on the case;
-
- sensitive material is material, the disclosure of which the disclosure officer believes would give rise to a real risk of serious prejudice to an important public interest; [the Code refers to material not meeting this definition as non-sensitive]
And, for completeness:
- 10.3 When a prosecutor provides material to the defence in accordance with the obligation under section 3 or section 7A of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, the prosecutor must at the same time provide the schedule of non-sensitive material to the defence.