Search Results

If Congress wanted to do something like that there are a variety of ways that it could do it. It could change the authority of the FBI in the federal bureaucracy to exclude Alaska. … It wouldn't be a crime to conduct FBI activities in Alaska per se, but because FBI agents are paid for their time, doing that would require an expenditure of funds not authorized by Congress. …

I guess my question is whether he had to err on being as elucidating as possible when testifying before Congress and providing as much information as he was able to? … This kind of conservation pattern is common in everyday speech, happens not infrequently in court even though it shouldn't, and happens more frequently in Congress where understanding more than precision …

There are all sorts of reasons that Congress would have legitimate interest in the affairs of private higher educational institutions, not least of which is the fact that Congress provides a substantial … that some member of Congress thinks is a problem and should be changed in a way that Congress has the legal authority to address. …

Congress, perfectly well. … for lying to Congress or refusing to testify). …

The case of William Blount in 1797 established the precedent that expulsion of a member by a chamber, rather than impeachment, is the proper process to remove a member of Congress. … Members of Congress may not be recalled, and are not automatically removed from office upon conviction of a crime. …

Many executive branch enforcement/implementation decisions are discretionary, but not all of them. When implementation is mandatory, a writ of mandamus can be filed to carry out the act. For example …

Individual members of Congress cannot compel a company to testify, although a failure to respond might result in legislation being adopted in a way contrary to the preferences of the person being asked …

There are no consequences for Congress. This follows, in part, from the Speech or Debate Clause, which is a clause in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 6, Clause 1). … The clause states that members of both Houses of Congress: shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their …

Congress has the authority to regulate many aspects of federal elections. In particular, Article I, Section 4 of the U.S. … Constitution states: The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time …

Many of the first women in Congress ended up taking office in this manner. … Does he need to appear when the new Congress convenes, be sworn in, and then resign? No. Does the person who came second in his election have any part to play in the matter? No. …

The Real Question The rules of Congress and relevant statutes and the U.S. … As the president of the Senate, he is supposed to preside over the joint session of Congress when this all happens. …

There is an area of the law where Congress does this exact thing. … But, for the most part, Congress doesn't push too hard in this area and the judiciary accepts the requirements that Congress does impose as valid. …

would this violate the constitutional rights of that House member's constituents to always be represented in Congress? There is no such right. …

While it isn't expressly forbidden, it is very rare to see this in legislature adopted statutes, which usually incorporate some other source by reference when there is an intent to do so. In contrast, …

It is not conditioned on that individual engaging in conduct to perform the office any differently, and Congress is expressly authorized to do so by law. … Equally important, Congress can't be guilty collectively of a crime, and individual members of Congress are absolutely immune from civil and criminal liability for their official actions under the Speech …